"Packets/ParseVariant.ih" did not exist on "a6038f6ddfa786398ba8433c154fed6dcdbf5bb2"
- Jul 10, 2017
-
-
Marcel Koch authored
-
- Jul 07, 2017
-
-
Marcel Koch authored
-
- Jun 06, 2017
- May 26, 2017
-
-
René Heß authored
-
- May 25, 2017
-
-
René Heß authored
-
- May 15, 2017
-
-
René Heß authored
-
- May 03, 2017
-
-
Dominic Kempf authored
-
Dominic Kempf authored
-
Dominic Kempf authored
-
- Apr 28, 2017
-
-
Dominic Kempf authored
-
Dominic Kempf authored
-
- Apr 27, 2017
-
-
Dominic Kempf authored
It was the wrong level of asbtraction!
-
- Apr 26, 2017
-
-
Dominic Kempf authored
-
Dominic Kempf authored
-
Dominic Kempf authored
-
Dominic Kempf authored
-
- Apr 25, 2017
-
-
Dominic Kempf authored
-
Dominic Kempf authored
-
Dominic Kempf authored
Lets see in the future what is necessary and whats not
-
Dominic Kempf authored
-
- Apr 24, 2017
-
-
Dominic Kempf authored
-
- Apr 20, 2017
-
-
Dominic Kempf authored
-
- Apr 13, 2017
-
-
René Heß authored
-
Dominic Kempf authored
-
Dominic Kempf authored
-
- Mar 30, 2017
- Mar 29, 2017
- Mar 28, 2017
-
-
René Heß authored
-
René Heß authored
-
Dominic Kempf authored
-
- Mar 27, 2017
-
-
René Heß authored
We avoid the bug by not applying the transformation and casting the result of jacobianInverseTransposed to a FieldMatrix. This way we do not exploit the diagonal structure of the Transformation. Should get fixed in the near future.
-
- Mar 24, 2017
-
-
René Heß authored
-
René Heß authored
Example: Before this commit the expression \sum_i a_i (\nabla v)_i + \sum_j b_j (\nabla v)_j was split into two accumulation terms: 1) a_k with corresponding test function (\nabla v)_k 2) b_l with corresponding test function (\nabla v)_l Now we split into: a_k + b_k with corresponding test function (\nabla v)_k This is possible since we have linearity in the test function. TODO: Jacobians are not yet working
-
René Heß authored
-
- Feb 03, 2017
-
-
Dominic Kempf authored
But only when they are actually used!
-
- Feb 02, 2017
-
-
Dominic Kempf authored
-