- Mar 29, 2017
- Mar 28, 2017
-
-
Dominic Kempf authored
-
René Heß authored
-
René Heß authored
-
Dominic Kempf authored
-
- Mar 27, 2017
-
-
René Heß authored
We avoid the bug by not applying the transformation and casting the result of jacobianInverseTransposed to a FieldMatrix. This way we do not exploit the diagonal structure of the Transformation. Should get fixed in the near future.
-
René Heß authored
-
René Heß authored
-
René Heß authored
In the end I had to combine the last two versions. For jacobians: - We want to split according to the FunctionView (e.g. Stokes). - We don't want to split according to gradients (e.g. sumfactorization).
-
- Mar 24, 2017
-
-
René Heß authored
-
René Heß authored
-
René Heß authored
-
René Heß authored
-
René Heß authored
-
René Heß authored
Example: Before this commit the expression \sum_i a_i (\nabla v)_i + \sum_j b_j (\nabla v)_j was split into two accumulation terms: 1) a_k with corresponding test function (\nabla v)_k 2) b_l with corresponding test function (\nabla v)_l Now we split into: a_k + b_k with corresponding test function (\nabla v)_k This is possible since we have linearity in the test function. TODO: Jacobians are not yet working
-
René Heß authored
-
René Heß authored
-
- Feb 07, 2017
-
-
Dominic Kempf authored
-
- Feb 03, 2017
-
-
Dominic Kempf authored
-
Dominic Kempf authored
-
Dominic Kempf authored
But only when they are actually used!
-
- Feb 02, 2017
-
-
Dominic Kempf authored
-
Dominic Kempf authored
-
- Feb 01, 2017
-
-
Dominic Kempf authored
-
Dominic Kempf authored
-
- Jan 31, 2017
-
-
Dominic Kempf authored
-
Dominic Kempf authored
-
Dominic Kempf authored
-
Dominic Kempf authored
-
Dominic Kempf authored
-
Dominic Kempf authored
-
Dominic Kempf authored
It should be possible to have multiple of these with different increment
-
- Jan 27, 2017
-
-
Dominic Kempf authored
-
- Jan 26, 2017
- Jan 25, 2017
-
-
René Heß authored
Note: Right now this is only done for FastDGGridOperator.
-
Dominic Kempf authored
-