- Mar 29, 2017
- Mar 28, 2017
-
-
René Heß authored
-
- Mar 27, 2017
-
-
René Heß authored
In the end I had to combine the last two versions. For jacobians: - We want to split according to the FunctionView (e.g. Stokes). - We don't want to split according to gradients (e.g. sumfactorization).
-
- Mar 24, 2017
-
-
René Heß authored
-
René Heß authored
-
René Heß authored
-
René Heß authored
Example: Before this commit the expression \sum_i a_i (\nabla v)_i + \sum_j b_j (\nabla v)_j was split into two accumulation terms: 1) a_k with corresponding test function (\nabla v)_k 2) b_l with corresponding test function (\nabla v)_l Now we split into: a_k + b_k with corresponding test function (\nabla v)_k This is possible since we have linearity in the test function. TODO: Jacobians are not yet working
-
René Heß authored
-
René Heß authored
-
- Dec 12, 2016
-
-
Dominic Kempf authored
-
- Oct 18, 2016
-
-
Dominic Kempf authored
-
- Oct 12, 2016
-
-
Dominic Kempf authored
-
Dominic Kempf authored
-
Dominic Kempf authored
-
Dominic Kempf authored
-
- Oct 11, 2016
-
-
Dominic Kempf authored
-
Dominic Kempf authored
Very wild, totally WIP.
-
- Sep 23, 2016
-
-
Dominic Kempf authored
-
- Apr 28, 2016
-
-
Dominic Kempf authored
-
- Apr 27, 2016
-
-
Dominic Kempf authored
-
- Apr 20, 2016
-
-
Dominic Kempf authored
Some work on parameter classes, a bugfix on the splitting algorithm some simplifications in the generation stage
-
- Apr 07, 2016
-
-
Dominic Kempf authored
UFL did not like my way of replacing some args with 1 as it destroyed the shape information. It now remains in the expression, but triggers code generation separately.
-
Dominic Kempf authored
-
- Feb 24, 2016
-
-
Dominic Kempf authored
-
Dominic Kempf authored
and remove old implementation
-
- Feb 22, 2016
-
-
Dominic Kempf authored
-
- Feb 16, 2016
-
-
Dominic Kempf authored
-
- Dec 30, 2015
-
-
Dominic Kempf authored
-
- Sep 16, 2015
-
-
Dominic Kempf authored
-